Abstract
- Focused on treaty-based state formation grounded in existing international frameworks and law.
- Combines an academic, legal, and diplomatic lens with entrepreneurial strategy, thinking, and execution.
- Donations are not yet accepted, nor is membership yet offered; this website serves as an educational, informational, and outreach resource, as well as a public archive.
Who this is for
Diplomatic and governmental stakeholders
For officials and advisers working within treaty‑based international systems who need clear, lawful, and reputationally sound approaches to new state formation.
Academic and research audiences
For scholars and research institutions examining statehood, recognition, and institutional legitimacy through a rigorous but practical analytical lens.
Institutional builders and strategic capital
For founders, operators, and long‑term investors seeking a lawful and executable pathway from concept to functioning sovereign institutions.
Why it matters
Legitimacy as an institutional outcome
In international practice, legitimacy emerges through treaties, institutions, and recognition. Startup States treats legitimacy as something that can be deliberately structured rather than merely asserted.
Reform through lawful partnership
A treaty‑first approach favours consent and stability, reducing the risks associated with confrontation by embedding innovation within negotiated legal frameworks.
Clarity suitable for institutional adoption
The model is written for policy review and legal analysis, with clear definitions and structure that translate easily across governments, universities, and organisations.
Key facts
Primary artefact
StartupStates_v1.1final.pdf (PDF)
https://www.startupstates.swiss/StartupStates_v1.1final.pdf
Core thesis
The most credible pathway to new sovereign states is treaty‑based consent combined with recognition‑aware sequencing, executed with institutional discipline and strategic clarity.
Positioning
Academic rigour with diplomatic realism and founder‑grade execution. Designed for lawful partnership, institutional credibility, and real‑world implementation.